The 1962 Herbert Lom version
+7
Raphael
PhantomAngel777
HDKingsbury
Scorp
Viscountess
ML6
operafantomet
11 posters
Page 1 of 1
The 1962 Herbert Lom version
I'm about to watch the 1962 Herbert Lom version now... I can't remember if I've seen it or not, but I found a hilariously cheap DVD of it in Copenhagen - we're talking DKK 25, app. $4,5 - so of course I bought it.
Any thoughts of this version? i'll contribute a lot more when I've actually SEEN it...
Any thoughts of this version? i'll contribute a lot more when I've actually SEEN it...
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
First observation: So Carlotta is more or less replaced by a Maria Callas blueprint in the beginning? My initial reaction was that "boy, her profile is similar to Maria Callas", and then they called her Maria... Interesting.
Hanging of Buquet was quite well solved.
Christine looks so 60s! With a dash of Mary Poppins, especially in that bright blue skirt, white blouse and hairdo.
Halfway through the movie: darn, I HAVE seen it before!
The Phantom slapping Christine seemed so unmotivated, ha-ha.
Hanging of Buquet was quite well solved.
Christine looks so 60s! With a dash of Mary Poppins, especially in that bright blue skirt, white blouse and hairdo.
Halfway through the movie: darn, I HAVE seen it before!
The Phantom slapping Christine seemed so unmotivated, ha-ha.
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
Because this thread just ASKED for it, and I use this anytime I feel the need to show some Phantom hatred (on other sites, trust me):
ML6- Posts : 873
Join date : 2009-10-28
Age : 36
Location : USA
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
Hahaha, what's UP with that slapping? So random.
To be honest, I'm glad I didn't pay more for this movie. Whereas it's always enjoyable to see a Phantom movie, this one is far from Leroux's story, I'm surprised they could call it Phantom at all. And the ending seemed just as unmotivated as "Love Never Dies".
That said, I was entertained when I watched it.
To be honest, I'm glad I didn't pay more for this movie. Whereas it's always enjoyable to see a Phantom movie, this one is far from Leroux's story, I'm surprised they could call it Phantom at all. And the ending seemed just as unmotivated as "Love Never Dies".
That said, I was entertained when I watched it.
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
They've called worse things "Phantom".operafantomet wrote:Hahaha, what's UP with that slapping? So random.
To be honest, I'm glad I didn't pay more for this movie. Whereas it's always enjoyable to see a Phantom movie, this one is far from Leroux's story, I'm surprised they could call it Phantom at all. And the ending seemed just as unmotivated as "Love Never Dies".
That said, I was entertained when I watched it.
Viscountess- Posts : 266
Join date : 2009-09-22
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
Post the water scene! That totally had me in stitches. Petrie asks that dwarf guy for some water, and I thought it was going to be a nice gesture in that he thought Christine needed a drink. But no, instead the dwarf gets yucky water from the lake and gives it to Petrie, who then pours it over Christine's face! Love it!
BTW, in his bio back when he played Firmin in the Lloyd Webber version, Bruce Montague said he played some part in this film...but last time I checked he wasn't in the credits (at least on IMDb...)...can anyone solve the mystery?
BTW, in his bio back when he played Firmin in the Lloyd Webber version, Bruce Montague said he played some part in this film...but last time I checked he wasn't in the credits (at least on IMDb...)...can anyone solve the mystery?
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
I didn't know (or notice)! Wouldn't he have been a child back then? Or at least very young.Scorp wrote:BTW, in his bio back when he played Firmin in the Lloyd Webber version, Bruce Montague said he played some part in this film...but last time I checked he wasn't in the credits (at least on IMDb...)...can anyone solve the mystery?
That water thing had me giggle too. And I thought Christine was to drink that water even after the dwarf filled the cup in the lake. I was like "eeeeew!". But then.... SPLASH!
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
OMG, it's been so long since I saw this version, reading all these posts made me smile with fond memories. Back in the day, before ALW wrote his show, I had to satisfy my love for the story by watching third rate Phantoms like this and the one with Max. Schell.
Herbert Lom's long been a favorite actor of mine, but this movie did him no credit at all. And I couldn't even enjoy his voice because of that full-faced mask.
As far as I was concerned, the only interesting character was Michael Gough's Lord D'Arcy. He was delightfully sleazy.
As for the dwarf? Ugh! Hammer made some great horror films in its hey day...but this one was a bit of a stinker.
Herbert Lom's long been a favorite actor of mine, but this movie did him no credit at all. And I couldn't even enjoy his voice because of that full-faced mask.
As far as I was concerned, the only interesting character was Michael Gough's Lord D'Arcy. He was delightfully sleazy.
As for the dwarf? Ugh! Hammer made some great horror films in its hey day...but this one was a bit of a stinker.
HDKingsbury- Posts : 128
Join date : 2009-09-29
Age : 124
Location : Ohio
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
I also ended up liking him the most, which felt a bit odd.HDKingsbury wrote:As far as I was concerned, the only interesting character was Michael Gough's Lord D'Arcy. He was delightfully sleazy.
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
LOL! I'm glad I wasn't the only one. Prof. Petrie was almost too kind, too innocent to be attractive. But Lord D'Arcy? He was wicked, he knew it and he loved it! There's nothing like a rake and a scoundrel to make a girl's heart beat a little quicker...or have I been reading too many Regency romances?!
HDKingsbury- Posts : 128
Join date : 2009-09-29
Age : 124
Location : Ohio
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
Haha! I'm guilty of that too, so who knows...
But thing is that when people manage to play a twisted character believable it's so intriguing to watch. I guess it's a sort of "I could - and would - never be that mean, but I find it intriguing to watch someone who can - and is". Probably some Freudian emotions playing up.
But thing is that when people manage to play a twisted character believable it's so intriguing to watch. I guess it's a sort of "I could - and would - never be that mean, but I find it intriguing to watch someone who can - and is". Probably some Freudian emotions playing up.
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
Okay, because all of you asked for the water scene. I'm going to create a gif of it. It'll be up later!
ML6- Posts : 873
Join date : 2009-10-28
Age : 36
Location : USA
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
YAY!!! Can't wait!!
HDKingsbury- Posts : 128
Join date : 2009-09-29
Age : 124
Location : Ohio
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
BECAUSE YOU GUYS WANTED IT (I shamelessly had to rip it from the Phantom Reviewer's video, they took down the other ones):
ML6- Posts : 873
Join date : 2009-10-28
Age : 36
Location : USA
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
"Splish, spash, I was taking a bath...
'Long about Saturday night..."
'Long about Saturday night..."
HDKingsbury- Posts : 128
Join date : 2009-09-29
Age : 124
Location : Ohio
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
That damned dwarf thing just creepily staring from the side is what bugs me. He was getting a kick out of it.
ML6- Posts : 873
Join date : 2009-10-28
Age : 36
Location : USA
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
The Phantom is slapping her and throwing water at her, ha-ha-ha! Gives a whole new dimension to "SIIING!! For MEEEEE!"
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
If they didn't take down all the other parts, I would have made an amazing gif of the chandelier falling on him and crushing him. The look on his face and his 'heroic jump' from the box is so wtf-worthy.
ML6- Posts : 873
Join date : 2009-10-28
Age : 36
Location : USA
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
operafantomet wrote:The Phantom is slapping her and throwing water at her, ha-ha-ha! Gives a whole new dimension to "SIIING!! For MEEEEE!"
LOL, what the hell man? I'm tempted to see this, but since everyone says its not that great...
From what I gather, this Erik is not afraid to tell Christine she's a twit when she's being a twit.
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
PhantomAngel777 wrote:operafantomet wrote:The Phantom is slapping her and throwing water at her, ha-ha-ha! Gives a whole new dimension to "SIIING!! For MEEEEE!"
LOL, what the hell man? I'm tempted to see this, but since everyone says its not that great...
From what I gather, this Erik is not afraid to tell Christine she's a twit when she's being a twit.
Basically, you nailed it. I find Herbert Lom so... oddly casted. I don't know why he was chosen. All I know is that he must have had a light schedule between him playing Chief Inspector Dreyfus... lol
ML6- Posts : 873
Join date : 2009-10-28
Age : 36
Location : USA
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
It's definitely a different take on their relationship than we're usually exposed toPhantomAngel777 wrote:operafantomet wrote:The Phantom is slapping her and throwing water at her, ha-ha-ha! Gives a whole new dimension to "SIIING!! For MEEEEE!"
LOL, what the hell man? I'm tempted to see this, but since everyone says its not that great...
From what I gather, this Erik is not afraid to tell Christine she's a twit when she's being a twit.
R.
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
I have mixed feelings about this version. I liked the scenes that Erik is in, but I hate the rest of it. I like his mask in this version the best, but it is a little much for the "deformity" he has.
mauerite#5- Posts : 10
Join date : 2010-08-26
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
I love Hammer movies and I think this was good version, with photography and some of the set design showing typically gorgeous work of Jack Asher and Bernard Robinson.
RoseOfTransylvania- Posts : 59
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 53
Location : Land beyond the forest
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
RIP Michael Gough, who played Lord Ambrose D'Arcy in the Hammer production of "Phantom." He was 94 years old.
R.
R.
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
operafantomet wrote:The Phantom is slapping her and throwing water at her, ha-ha-ha! Gives a whole new dimension to "SIIING!! For MEEEEE!"
Lol, yeah I thought the same thing when I first watched it many moons ago...it's a good version but not my fav...
Re: The 1962 Herbert Lom version
Herbert Lom dies at 95.
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/09/27/herbert-lom-died/
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/09/27/herbert-lom-died/
Similar topics
» The 2004 movie (ALW version)
» The 1925 Lon Chaney Version
» New musical version opening in NYC
» Version with Deborah Sasson
» The Dario Argento Version: Why Do Phans Hate it?
» The 1925 Lon Chaney Version
» New musical version opening in NYC
» Version with Deborah Sasson
» The Dario Argento Version: Why Do Phans Hate it?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum